Your client, your bank and your auditor no longer want a declaration, they want evidence. STRATA ESG keeps every figure attached to its supporting document, its version and its calculation method, and returns it in the format each one requires.
No claim without evidence.
The frameworks fed by the same dataset
8 frameworks
served by a single entry: CSRD and ESRS, the voluntary reporting standard, EU Taxonomy, GRI, ISSB, CDP, emissions reporting and supplier rating preparation.
90 seconds
to know what applies to you, with no account and no card. Eight questions, six regulatory regimes, each dated and sourced.
Every figure
published carries its document, its version and its method. That is what separates data from a declaration.
To the decimal
the calculation can be replayed two years later. Same data, same result, with the method then in force.
What changed
Three moves in eighteen months shifted the value from the report to the evidence. These are not trends, they are legal texts, each with its date of entry into force.
The French state now offers sustainability reporting at no cost, across ten regulations, and more than thirty thousand companies use it. Good. That is no longer where your risk sits.
The European regulation on ESG rating providers requires methodologies to be published and encourages separate E, S and G ratings rather than one aggregate score. The regulator has ruled: what matters is being able to show how the figure was obtained.
Your client wants to know where the figure comes from. Your bank wants a reliability level field by field. Your auditor wants the state of your file at the closing date, not today's. No report answers that. A body of evidence does.
Sources: regulation (EU) 2024/3005, the delegated regulation of 3 July 2026 carrying the voluntary reporting standard, and the French public portal.
Our conviction
Since the Omnibus reform, the sustainability reporting directive only targets large companies, yet the pressure on SMEs hasn't eased: clients, banks and investors all demand sustainability data, now structured by the voluntary reporting standard. Most SMEs have neither a consultancy's budget nor a dedicated department's time. STRATA ESG closes that gap: a software layer that turns weeks of expert work into minutes, without sacrificing rigour.
The demonstration
Most software shows you a score. This is the opposite: a single value, and everything that lets you defend it the day someone asks where it comes from.
Gross greenhouse gas emissions, Scope 1
1,284tonnes CO2 equivalent
What this same value feeds
It is entered once. Each framework reads it in its own place, under its own code, with no re entry and no risk of two reports contradicting each other.
Illustrative values on a demonstration file. What the capture demonstrates is not the figure, it is the structure holding it up: that structure is identical on a real file.
Every correction adds a dated, justified version to the log. On a closed reporting year, reason and note become mandatory: the trail an assurance engagement requires.
Create your reporting years, close them, compare one year to the previous one. Every variance is computed, converted into the right unit and traced back to its evidence.
Sites, buildings, suppliers, internal indicators: the entity registry links every measure to what carries it, and resolves company, VAT or internal identifiers.
Field capture
A meter reading, a skip, an incident, an audit visit. What founds a figure sits on a site, often without a network, and rarely in front of a computer. The field application takes the document at the source and moves it into the vault, with its date, its position and its requirement code.
Shipped, Android and iOS, internal distribution. It opens on accounts whose plan includes field capture.
The dividing line
Four differences, each verifiable in the product rather than in a brochure.
A completed questionnaire
An attached supporting document
Versioned vault and a two way evidence graph: where this value comes from, and what moves if you change it.
An assigned rating
A recomputable rating
Point by point breakdown, quantified counterfactual, and a calculation tested to return the same result on the same data.
A label with a date
A continuous trail
Hash chained registry, sealed journal, and evidence expiry tracked over time.
A file you send
Access that is traced and revocable
You see every read, how long it lasted, and you cut it off whenever you want.
The deliverables
A report as an attachment ends up in an inbox. Our deliverables can be checked by whoever receives them, with no account to create.
You upload the questionnaire you received. It comes back in its original format, in its original cells, formulas and formatting preserved, with an annex proving every answer. The following year, only the values that need updating are asked for again.
Your banker, your auditor or your client opens a link. They see what you decided, for as long as you decided. You see every read, and you cut it off whenever you want.
You prove a figure without sending the full document. The extract carries the fingerprint of the source document: the recipient checks that it really comes from there, without seeing the rest.
Two exports of the same unchanged file carry the same fingerprint, two years apart. That is the difference between a document and a piece of evidence.
The golden rule
A score you cannot explain will not survive three minutes in front of an auditor or a procurement team. Every published value keeps the link to the document that grounds it, to the datapoint that carries it and to the disclosure that requires it. The path can be walked in both directions.
facture_elec_2025.pdf
Uploaded on 14/02, timestamped, fingerprint frozen, expiry date tracked.
ENERGY_CONSUMPTION_TOTAL
412 MWh, version 2, dated and justified correction. Nothing is ever overwritten.
VSME B3, ESRS E1-5, GRI 302-1
The same datapoint feeds every framework that asks for it, with no re-entry.
E, 78 out of 100
Computed from the state of each required disclosure, never roughly estimated.
The link works the other way round too: from a score, you go back down to the uploaded file and to the person who approved it.
What makes the difference
A completed questionnaire
An attached document
A form states an intention. A dated document, tied to the data it grounds, states a fact that stands up to challenge.
An assigned rating
A recomputable rating
A rating nobody can reproduce will not survive a contradiction. Ours can be replayed and explained, disclosure by disclosure.
A label at a point in time
A continuous trail
A stamp earned once ages. A log of versions and evidence follows the company year after year.
This traceability requirement applies across the whole ecosystem. Our scores remain indicative and do not replace an audit by a licensed statutory auditor: they provide the file such an audit can rely on.
The architecture
ESG Optimizer is the cockpit where your data lives. Scope, Watch and Academy are modules that plug into it, Foundation gives it its baseline. Every building block is shown with its real status, never with a promise.
Monitoring module of the cockpit
Official sources reviewed daily, filtered to your company's perimeter, and turned into dated deadlines. Every alert carries the link to its text. Three principles: every alert traces back to its text, your profile rather than the whole feed, dates rather than intentions.
Module under construction. Not open to the public, no price shown, no date announced.
Training module of the cockpit
Short paths on the voluntary reporting standard and on carbon, plus contextual micro learning indexed by requirement, shown inside the cockpit at the exact point the question comes up. The content explains the standard, it never comments on your data.
Catalogue not published. No path is open for enrolment at this date.
The comparison baseline
Foundation is not a product for sale. It is the observatory of SME sustainability maturity, and the baseline that lets the cockpit position a company against its sector. Here, free is the promise, not the bait.
Not open. Nothing is published at this address at this date.
A second region
Same data foundation, different demand. In West Africa, what is asked of you is not a score, it is a file that holds in front of a lender or a European buyer. The region has its own domain, its own currency and its own price list.
Inside the cockpit
The EU Taxonomy and the social pillar are not sold separately. They are built inside the cockpit, on the same data, so clients never re-enter what they have already provided. This is the real state of play, with no promise dressed up as a feature.
Covered today
CSRD and ESRS
Double materiality and coverage of the 10 standards, aligned with EFRAG methodology.
VSME
The voluntary SME standard, published by EFRAG and recommended by the European Commission.
EU Taxonomy
Eligibility, alignment and turnover, CapEx and OpEx ratios under Article 8, on the regulatory profile in force.
Carbon footprint
Scopes 1, 2 and 3 on the ADEME Base Empreinte, brought in by the Scope module.
GRI, ISSB, CDP and BEGES
The same canonical datapoints come out in the grammar of each framework, plus the XBRL tagging expected at filing.
In progress inside the cockpit
Social pillar
ESRS social indicators are in place, the gender equality index and social report are still to be delivered.
Supplier value chain
The data model exists, the supplier portal and due diligence logic are being built.
Labels and environmental claims
Label preparation and claim review, on the same evidence base as the rest of the cockpit.
Since the delegated regulation of 3 July 2026, a client cannot require a partner with fewer than one thousand employees to provide more than the content of the voluntary reporting standard. Many procurement teams still do not know this, and keep sending their in house form.
Indicative diagnostic, produced by applying public rules to your answers. It does not constitute legal advice.
The exact limit that applies to you
Eight questions, six regulatory regimes reviewed, each with its text and its date of entry into force.
The sentence you can put to them
Written, sourced, ready to paste into your answer. This is not a refusal on principle, it is a professional reply.
What you still have to produce
The list of what remains owed, named, with who holds it inside your company and where to look for it.
The calendar
Five deadlines already published, with what they carry. None of them is a projection of ours.
27 September 2026
The directive on environmental claims requires you to substantiate what you display on your products and your materials.
1 October 2026
A third party can compute and publish a brand's environmental cost without its agreement, and missing data is treated at worst case.
30 December 2026
Plot level geolocation, declaration in the European system, five year retention. Cocoa, coffee, palm oil, rubber, timber. Second deadline on 30 June 2027.
In force
Only 31% of the entities in scope file on time, and the documented cause is not reluctance, it is access to information.
Since June 2024
Access to public transition schemes is conditional on an up to date emissions report.
Dates recorded on 13 August 2026 from the published texts. This table is informative and does not replace your adviser's analysis.
Who it is for
We do not segment by company size, we segment by the scene that triggers the search.
The scene
An email from your largest client's procurement team. Sustainability questionnaire attached, one hundred and eighty lines, in house format, fifteen days to answer, and a sentence about supplier listing.
SME under pressure from its value chain
This is not compliance, it is commercial risk. No time, no data, no idea where to look. And above all the fear of writing something untrue.
What we answer
You do not have to give everything. And what you do give, you must be able to prove.
The scene
Your clients ask you the question, you have no tooled method, and you spend your evenings in a spreadsheet.
Accounting firm and sustainability consultant
The real constraint is not the tool, it is the billable method and protecting your professional liability. Signing a sustainability deliverable puts your name on it.
What we answer
Bill the advice, not the data entry. And when you sign, the file holds.
The scene
First year under the revised standards, a statutory auditor about to check, and a collection spreadsheet that will not survive it.
Sustainability lead of a company in scope
The file has to survive a verification, not only a reading. Replay at a past date, assurance levels, separation of duties, sealing before publication.
What we answer
Your file has to survive a verification, not only a reading.
Our rule, applied to ourselves
We ask our clients to claim only what they can prove. Here is what that rule cost us.
Tamper proof evidence
Removed on 1 August 2026Our evidence is hash chained, which makes any modification detectable. It is not anchored with a third party timestamping service, so we do not speak of tamper proofing.
More than 200 indicators
RemovedThe real count is 73 questions in the questionnaire and 88 requirements in the register. No set in the product comes close to 200.
90 day action plan
RemovedThe engine produces indicative deadlines in a closed vocabulary. It produces no 90 day horizon.
Guaranteed availability
RemovedThat sentence will only come back the day a contract carries a quantified commitment and a penalty.
This list is dated and it will grow. It is the only sales argument we actually want to keep.
See the full logWhere to start